Short-Term Debt and the Greenspan-Guidotti Rule
Posted by slowsmile December 29, 2009

The little-known Greenspan-Guidotti rule accurately predicts when a government will default. This rule is what all speculators use to predict the health and status of the currency markets. And, according to the rule and Porter’s calculations, the U.S. is toast.
Article By Porter Stansberry
It’s one of those numbers that’s so unbelievable you have to actually think about it for a while… Within the next 12 months, the U.S. Treasury will have to refinance $2 trillion in short-term debt. And that’s not counting any additional deficit spending, which is estimated to be around $1.5 trillion. Put the two numbers together. Then ask yourself, how in the world can the Treasury borrow $3.5 trillion in only one year? That’s an amount equal to nearly 30% of our entire GDP. And we’re the world’s biggest economy. Where will the money come from?
How did we end up with so much short-term debt? Like most entities that have far too much debt - whether subprime borrowers, GM, Fannie, or GE - the U.S. Treasury has tried to minimize its interest burden by borrowing for short durations and then “rolling over” the loans when they come due. As they say on Wall Street, “a rolling debt collects no moss.” What they mean is, as long as you can extend the debt, you have no problem. Unfortunately, that leads folks to take on ever greater amounts of debt… at ever shorter durations… at ever lower interest rates. Sooner or later, the creditors wake up and ask themselves: What are the chances I will ever actually be repaid? And that’s when the trouble starts. Interest rates go up dramatically. Funding costs soar. The party is over. Bankruptcy is next.
When governments go bankrupt it’s called “a default.” Currency speculators figured out how to accurately predict when a country would default. Two well-known economists - Alan Greenspan and Pablo Guidotti - published the secret formula in a 1999 academic paper. That’s why the formula is called the Greenspan-Guidotti rule. The rule states: To avoid a default, countries should maintain hard currency reserves equal to at least 100% of their short-term foreign debt maturities. The world’s largest money management firm, PIMCO, explains the rule this way: “The minimum benchmark of reserves equal to at least 100% of short-term external debt is known as the Greenspan-Guidotti rule. Greenspan-Guidotti is perhaps the single concept of reserve adequacy that has the most adherents and empirical support.”
The principle behind the rule is simple. If you can’t pay off all of your foreign debts in the next 12 months, you’re a terrible credit risk. Speculators are going to target your bonds and your currency, making it impossible to refinance your debts. A default is assured.
So how does America rank on the Greenspan-Guidotti scale? It’s a guaranteed default. The U.S. holds gold, oil, and foreign currency in reserve. The U.S. has 8,133.5 metric tonnes of gold (it is the world’s largest holder). That’s 16,267,000 pounds. At current dollar values, it’s worth around $300 billion. The U.S. strategic petroleum reserve shows a current total position of 725 million barrels. At current dollar prices, that’s roughly $58 billion worth of oil. And according to the IMF, the U.S. has $136 billion in foreign currency reserves. So altogether… that’s around $500 billion of reserves. Our short-term foreign debts are far bigger.
According to the U.S. Treasury, $2 trillion worth of debt will mature in the next 12 months. So looking only at short-term debt, we know the Treasury will have to finance at least $2 trillion worth of maturing debt in the next 12 months. That might not cause a crisis if we were still funding our national debt internally. But since 1985, we’ve been a net debtor to the world. Today, foreigners own 44% of all our debts, which means we owe foreign creditors at least $880 billion in the next 12 months - an amount far larger than our reserves.
Keep in mind, this only covers our existing debts. The Office of Management and Budget is predicting a $1.5 trillion budget deficit over the next year. That puts our total funding requirements on the order of $3.5 trillion over the next 12 months.
So… where will the money come from? Total domestic savings in the U.S. are only around $600 billion annually. Even if we all put every penny of our savings into U.S. Treasury debt, we’re still going to come up nearly $3 trillion short. That’s an annual funding requirement equal to roughly 40% of GDP. Where is the money going to come from? From our foreign creditors? Not according to Greenspan-Guidotti. And not according to the Indian or the Russian central bank, which have stopped buying Treasury bills and begun to buy enormous amounts of gold. The Indians bought 200 metric tonnes this month. Sources in Russia say the central bank there will double its gold reserves.
So where will the money come from? The printing press. The Federal Reserve has already monetized nearly $2 trillion worth of Treasury debt and mortgage debt. This weakens the value of the dollar and devalues our existing Treasury bonds. Sooner or later, our creditors will face a stark choice: Hold our bonds and continue to see the value diminish slowly, or try to escape to gold and see the value of their U.S. bonds plummet.
One thing they’re not going to do is buy more of our debt. Which central banks will abandon the dollar next? Brazil, Korea, and Chile. These are the three largest central banks that own the least amount of gold. None own even 1% of their total reserves in gold.
I examined these issues in much greater detail in the most recent issue of my newsletter, Porter Stansberry’s Investment Advisory, which we published last Friday. Coincidentally, the New York Times repeated our warnings - nearly word for word - in its paper today. (They didn’t mention Greenspan-Guidotti, however… It’s a real secret of international speculators.)




December 29th, 2009 at 12:27 pm
SLOWSMILE:
What if the U. S. simply prints more and more money, and pays back the debt? Infltion - yes. But, is that a patch that would work albeit wreck things long term.
December 29th, 2009 at 5:03 pm
Richard…The US can certainly print paper for a while because all the world’s creditor nations are stuck in the “Dollar Trap” — if the American dollar goes down, they all go down. However, this symbiotic dollar relationship is economically now much more useful to America than to all the other creditor nations. What the US government is doing is continually rolling over her ever-growing debt via her Treasuries — never effectively paying any of the debt back — so these creditor nations are continuously losing a great deal of their savings to America as a result. This situation is, understandably, no longer being tolerated and many of these credtors are now finally clocking that America cannot possibly pay this debt back.
The only possible strategy to lessen their dependence on the dollar is for all creditor nations to slowly but steadily purchase other more useful and valuable tangible resources such as gold, oil, metals and grain with their excess dollars. Russia, China, India, certain Middle East countries and other creditor nations have already started to do this for a while now. Therefore, as these creditor nations slowly purchase less and less US Treasuries, the value and worth of the dollar must forever head south with a very possible default at the end of the road. Another anti-dollar tactic has been to avoid accumulating dollars by purchasing useful resources in other currencies whenever possible. The recent open dumping of the petro-dollar for the euro by Russia, China, the Gulf States and France is an example of this simple strategy.
In answer to your question, the rampant printing of money would certainly work for a little while, but this simply cannot be sustained without a very bad effect on dollar value. There is a dollar train-wreck coming in the future — I don’t know exactly when — but, at the moment, all the creditor nations are discreetly trying hard to get off that dollar-train now. Meanwhile the Administration continues to bluff its tenuous monetary position, still refusing to acknowledge or change its economically dangerous spend policies as this dollar-train continues to roll head-on towards that immovable monetary brick wall.
December 30th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Slowsmile:
Are you a devotee or at least a listener of Igor Panarin’s thesis that the USA will collapse and disintegrate in 2010? I guess he has become somewhat of a celebrity in Moscow.
I will post an article on January 1-2, 2010.
January 2nd, 2010 at 8:28 pm
Richard…Although there are some possibilities with Panarin’s American hypothesis, remember that he does work for the Russian Foreign Ministry — another propaganda arm of the Russian govt. But there could certainly be some sort of rebellion in the US if the economy implodes, since within the last several years or so there has been an astonishing amount of unnecessary martial power extended to agencies like Homeland Security. I am sure that the US govt is aware of this. As to the break up of the US into 5 or 6 regions, I’ll wait and see.
As to Panarin’s assertion that Russia has fair claim to Alaskan territory, well this is laughable since it is well known that Alaska was sold outright and not leased to America and there are many supporting documents to prove this.
Although Panarin has predicted the American collapse in 2010, I do not adhere to this view. I think it could well survive until 2012 or slightly beyond — for no other reason than those suggested by both Nostradamus and the Mayan Calendar. One thing is sure, if nothing is done to address the internal and external assaults on the US economy as well as the US dollar and if the US govt blindly continues its wayward bluff, then there will be a major economic collapse of some sort in the future.
January 3rd, 2010 at 2:40 pm
Slowsmile:
Igor is feeding Russian hope that they can witness the USA desolve as the USSR did. His scenario is too fanciful for me - but good grist for debate and discussion. His premise of moral and ethiucal collapse is a leap for a onetime communist devotee from the flag bearer soviet nation that collapsed.