Robert Gibbs: Is the Tail Confidently Wagging the Dog ?
Posted by slowsmile May 30, 2009

I really hate and detest spin-doctors. That’s what we call government press advisers in UK who try to control the image of their government masters. Their job is to verbally buff and polish their master’s image to the press and public, to distract and demolish or belittle all opposition and dissent, to bend the truth and almost lie and to convince the national press media to tow the government line by whatever means possible. Usually, these misbegotten hustlers are among the finest and hardest-working control-freaks on the planet. But in UK the spin-doctor is now virtually a thing of the past, having been rousted, thoroughly beaten down and successfully exposed by the UK mainstream press. They are extinct dinosaurs — who only work quietly and meekly behind the scenes now.
But I see that this is certainly not the case in America. Here, you refer to spin-doctors as White House Press Secretaries. And it seems that America’s arch-doyen of upfront spin, Robert Gibbs, has voiced his angry opinions a little too far afield, resulting in the UK press now baying for his blood. And I admit, I find this situation quite funny. Although perhaps Mr Gibbs has successfully whipped up and brought onside all the usual US mainstream media who now faithfully tow and service the Obama Line so carefully, apparently the UK press just refuses to come to heel.
Anyway, here are two stories which will indicate how the UK press exercises its own particular brand of press freedoms and opinion. The first article — Robert Gibbs should apologize to the British for his sneering rant — is a fairly quiet but firm and fair analysis of both Obama and Gibbs attitude towards UK. The second article — Memo to attack dog Robert Gibbs: stop pooping on our lawn — is also a favourite. This somewhat uninhibited article does not hold back and is fairly cruel in its lambasting of both Mr. Gibbs and President Obama.
Robert Gibbs should apologize to the British for his sneering rant
From the UK Telegraph
Author: Nile Gardiner
Politico has an extraordinary report on Robert Gibbs, the White House Press Secretary, launching a furious broadside against the British press. Here are Gibbs’ sneering and condescending remarks:
“I want to speak generally about some reports I’ve witnessed over the past few years in the British media,” Gibbs said. “In some ways, I’m surprised it filtered down.”
“Let’s just say if I wanted to look up, if I wanted to read a write-up of how Manchester United fared last night in the Champions League Cup, I’d might open up a British newspaper,” he continued. “If I was looking for something that bordered on truthful news, I’m not entirely sure it’d be the first pack of clips I’d pick up.”
Gibbs’ juvenile comments followed an article in The Daily Telegraph relating to the President’s decision not to release new photos reportedly showing appalling prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib by a tiny minority of military personnel. The straightforward news piece, hotly disputed by the White House, is based upon an interview with Major General Antonio Taguba, who oversaw the inquiry into the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal.
For the record I firmly believe the President was right to refuse to release the photos in the face of pressure from the ACLU, which would only further inflame anti-American sentiment across the Muslim world. However I cannot recall an instance like this where the President’s official spokesman has blasted the press of a key ally - in this case America’s closest friend, Great Britain.
This kind of attack would normally be made against the likes of the North Korean or Iranian state media, but in the current climate of “engagement” with America’s enemies the White House is far more likely to attack its own allies. Gibbs’ remarks have echoes of a senior State Department official’s anti-British statements to The Sunday Telegraph after the appalling handling of the Prime Minister’s visit in March.
Can you imagine Gibbs making these remarks about The New York Times or The Washington Post, or NBC, ABC or CBS? This would never happen. The British press, especially the Telegraph, has been singled out because they frequently publish articles critical of the Obama administration and are not afraid to take on the status quo in Washington. Increasingly, millions of Americans are turning to online UK news websites for cutting edge reports on American politics and U.S. foreign policy that the mainstream media refuses to cover in the States, especially if it is unflattering to the Obama White House.
Robert Gibbs’ completely unwarranted rant against the British press is an absolute disgrace, and the President should disown his views. An unreserved apology by Gibbs is also in order.
For all its talk of “raising America’s standing” in the world after the Bush years, the Obama administration is doing a spectacularly bad job of reaching out to its allies. Unfortunately this is the new face of America’s public diplomacy, which will only serve to alienate public opinion across the Atlantic. Congratulations Gibbs - you’ve just made an enemy out of the entire British media, quite an achievement for the man in charge of selling the President’s message.
Memo to attack dog Robert Gibbs: stop pooping on our lawn
From UK Telegraph
Author: James Delingpole
Memo to US Press secetary Robert Gibbs
1. Congratulations. Your presidential regime has managed to secure the most supine, slobbering, spineless, unquestioning media coverage since Enver Hoxha’s Albania. A report last month by the Center for Media and Public Affairs said Obama has received more coverage than his two predecessors combined. On ABC, CBS and NBC news the majority of evaluations - 58 per cent - have been favourable. (Compare GW Bush - 33 per cent; Bill Clinton 44 per cent - in first 50 days of office). More importantly, you have Pravda. Yes, no less than 73 per cent of all evaluative comments in your chief propaganda organ - aka The New York Times - have been favourable to Obama.
2. Sure your congenitally libtard Mainstream Media were probably biased that way anyway, but you have played your part. Your combative style - which led you to dismiss the entire British print media just now in one glib, sneering phrase - has earned you the nickname “The Enforcer.” You have a reputation for coming down hard on any media outlet which doesn’t follow your approved version of reality. “I work the referee a little bit,” as you once put it. (A reference, perhaps, to when you played goalkeeper for your college football team).
3. If you are going to make clever-sounding football references displaying your rich understanding of the British press, try to get your terminology right. We call it the “Champions League.” Not the “Champions League cup.”
4. That’s only the beginning of your problems, matey. Your treatment not just of the British media but of Britain generally smacks of a risible ineptitude. First, you let President Obama send back the Winston Churchill bust. Then, you insult our visiting prime minister with a dismally low-key reception (worthy of a minor African head of state, not your closest and most loyal ally) and shoddy gifts (those DVDs). Then you compound the insult by having one of your monkeys declare, Chicago-politics-style, “”There’s nothing special about Britain. You’re just the same as the other 190 countries in the world. You shouldn’t expect special treatment.” OK so we know Obama’s not much interested in foreign affairs and has a special loathing for Britain because it roughed up his Kenyan granddad during the Mau Mau insurrection. But don’t you realise, that one of your jobs as his press secretary is to make out like he loves us so much even his underpants have a union flag on them?
5. Insulting the British print media. Big mistake. We know we’re not angels. We know we can go over the top sometimes. But unfortunately that’s a much bigger problem for you than it is for us. You see, while a lot of your mainstream media will hold fire on stories which they think may reflect poorly on your wondrous Obamamessiah - what his half-brother has been up to, say - we have fewer qualms about telling it like it is. So far, you’ve had a pretty easy ride. The Obama Kool Aid has proved almost as popular beverage in Britain as it is in the US. But just you wait till we start showing our teeth.
6. A lot of Americans know this. They appreciate our irreverence. They enjoy our frank criticisms of all the myriad areas where Obama is getting it so badly wrong - everything from his disastrous cap and trade measures, to his brutal treatment of Chrysler dealerships which didn’t support him, to his pork barrelling, to his failure to do anything that looks remotely like rescuing the US economy. That’s why they come to read us online: because they can and there’s nothing you can do to stop them.
7. We had a guy just like you over here once. Guy named Alastair Campbell. Did for our now heavily discredited prime minister Tony Blair what you do for Obama: a little light press bullying; professional turd polishing; that kind of thing. We hated Alastair Campbell, really loathed him. But he got away with bullying us because in those days we didn’t know any better. We were still going through this sort of dumb-cattle phase where we still had some vestigial respect for politicians and trust that they knew what they were doing.
8. But we don’t respect politicians any more. Not our politicians, and not yours either. Imagine how this new strain of irreverence bordering on utter contempt is going to affect our reporting of political affairs. Actually, you’ve no need to imagine. Just read some of our Telegraph blogs.




May 30th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
Slowsmile: Gibbs isn’t worthy of concern. The UK Telegraph’s “Pooping on our lawn” title is a grand putdown. Even as a Scot with Irish roots I so enjoy you Englander’s sarcasm. I just wouldn’t get all snotted off about him. He’s a caricature.
May 30th, 2009 at 11:10 pm
Richard…Of course your right. However I was astounded that Gibbs denounced the whole of the UK press media so sarcastically, a condemnation well known to have been caused by a stream of articles critical to the Obama administration from mainly the Telegraph newspaper. This event is perhaps a measure of Gibbs’ regard for his own ego and power. For a man who has been raised and bottled within the realms of journalism and PR — Gibbs is plainly unaware of how tenacious, grudging and unforgiving the UK press media can be. A good outcome from this will be that all the UK press will now rise to the bait, they will put Obama’s policies under a microscope and more fully criticize his peculiar policies(something that the US media has failed to do). I confess that I am not averse to this. President Obama needs a firecracker under his bucket to wake up….
July 3rd, 2009 at 11:41 am
I love it - before the election we were told all of the UK and Europe wanted Obama… what a great guy. You and all the rest of my stupid countrymen who voted for this guy are now crying… you got what you wanted now shut up.
July 3rd, 2009 at 12:10 pm
Eagle1….I love it too. I’m living in the Philippines and you appear to assume too much, get your facts right. I am from the UK bye the way. Also, read some of my other articles about Obama, they are mostly economic in content and I’m most defintiely not pro-Obama. I was willing to give his policies a chance, but he’s all hot air and no action so far.
Nice one, Eagle1. You seem to have the refined perceptions of a flea.
July 3rd, 2009 at 12:20 pm
Eagle1: I live in the U. S. and damned sure didn’t vote for Obama. But, I still have to “live with him.” The Glibless Mr. Gibbs is an embarrassment almost as much as Obama’s contrived “NEWS CONFERENCES” and absurd town hall meetings.