Inflation or Deflation?
Posted by slowsmile May 28, 2009
Here in the Philippines we are breaking into the rainy season and today it is persisting down with rain. But it’s not so bad, at least the rain is warm and the air is so much cooler. Makes a nice change from all that hot sun and humidity. I’ve been pondering on the financial crisis, wondering which way it’s going to go — will it be deflation, where GDP and growth are concurrently and neatly garroted and the whole economy remains neutered for years (because the velocity of money or spending is negligible) or hyperinflation which, driven completely by market and human behaviour, is where the population — en masse — suddenly decides in a panic to give up on their currency and effectively rush into hard assets such as commodities or other more stable currencies (where the velocity of money rapidly rises out of control)? Put simply — deflation utterly kills and stagnates or reverses the economy, whereas hyperinflation slays and decimates the national monetary base. So, both deflation or hyperinflation can easily train-wreck any economy. This is the choice. Both Europe and the US are currently in deflation, with the Fed trying to desperately turn this disinflation spiral — through its inflationary QE policies — back into a mild, steady inflation of about 6%. A helluva balancing act that is rarely successful.
“Obama would regulate bubbles,” quotes Politico last week.
Really? I guess Obama must be God then. Nobody – but nobody — has ever been able to regulate or spot any of the bubbles that have so suddenly and viciously erupted throughout the economic history of the US (…and anyone who does spot and warn of impending bubbles is either ignored or ridiculed). And the fact that Obama — who really knows absolutely nothing about economics — and who boldly spouts this trash with his rapidly tarnishing silver tongue, is surely testament to his complete lack of respect and disdain for his own beloved citizens. That statement by Obama is almost as dumb as him saying that Americans can save by spending more. Who’s he trying to kid? From the Daily Reckoning:
“Oh, the sheer absurdity of it all! We have a government that doesn’t even seem to know where bubbles come from. They don’t know how they work. They don’t know why they keep inflating. They don’t understand why you can’t deflate them slowly. In short, an administration with a rudimentary understanding of economics is confident it can regulate the next bubble - whatever it might be.”
While shaman Ben Bernanke recently decreed that the US economy will start to recover by the end of 2009 — which hat did he pull that one out of? Reasons? (none given, Ben has spoken) — and all this from a man whose Fed monetary policies and gross financial manipulations regularly and so consistently cause these bubbles in the first place without fail. So much for for the myth of free, honest markets.
Much has been said within the US media concerning the necessity of China continuing their steady purchasing of US Treasuries. But it’s all OK apparently, China is still purchasing our debt — so there’s no need to worry folks. Ah, but what the US media completely omitted to tell you is the fact that the Chinese are now purchasing short-term US Treasuries and have given up completely on the long-term 10, 20 and 30 year T-Bills. This is very bad news for the US. This new switch to short-term US Treasuries by China greatly hinders the US Government’s capability of simply “inflating away” their debt to China over 20-30 years(China now only holds these Treasuries for only 2 or 3 years — which is not enough time to dissolve the US debt by inflation). Other creditor countries are also doing this now and this is what is causing long-term US Treasury yields to move upwards so dangerously at the moment. Even if there is a mild recovery in the US stock market — within the next 18 months, when the Chinese see further evidence that both The Administration and the Fed have been lying and are continuing to inflate(devalue) the dollar (and perhaps, by then, they will have also lost their AAA rating) — thus eroding the value of even short-term US Treasuries, the Chinese are likely to abandon even these grossly manipulated and corrupted investment vehicles altogether in order to preserve their own surplus savings. The Chinese have already been buying up all the commodities and raw resources they can, both to protect their savings and to prepare their exit from this financial mess. And who can blame them?
Meanwhile, US GDP now stands at -5%, real unemployment is already at 20% and CPI inflation is still heading South towards negative (all figures from Shadowstats.com). And what is The Administration doing? Buying useless insolvent banks, buying toxic debt and generally funding Wall Street to the full, thereby accumulating massive unpayable trillions in debt against taxpayer liability as well as grossly inflating your dollar. Does that sound like a reasonable economic recovery policy? Bear in mind that hyperinflation generally leads to a fast economic death(think Weimar Republic(1923) or Zimbabwe), whereas deflation always seems to lead to a slower, lingering and more painful death(think Great Depression or Japan). The outcome — deflation or inflation — will depend on the existing and continuing Keynesian policy mistakes which are currently being achieved so effortlessly by the Obama Administration. Pure and simple. Take your pick.
That about covers it, I guess.
The sun is peeking through the clouds now. Think I’ll go for a paddle in the sea with my duck. We both need the exercise…




May 29th, 2009 at 4:14 am
I’ll take hyperinflation. Have had it in my head for most of the past 6 months and can’t seem to shake it. The latest spike in long term rates should be raising more alarm bells that it has. Interesting times are coming, and soon.
May 29th, 2009 at 4:44 am
I was in the hyperinflation camp as well, but I’ve recently read an article by Antal Fekete called “The Marginal Producivity of Debt” - a quantity that measures how effective debt is in promoting an increase in GDP(Not the same as Debt/GDP ratio) over a given period of time. Notably, this productivity measurement has been negative since 2006 ie pouring more debt money into the economy just isn’t helping the US economy.
Fekete also maintains that deflation is here to stay. His reasons are that all the govt. bailouts have gone to the banks — who will not spend or lend — so no money velocity there. As for the mainstreet citizen, he is using his money(if he still has a job) on only his debts, mortgage, essentials and is saving now. As well, there is a huge amount tied up in Treasuries. So all money is tied up, even though massive QE is occurring.
Could go either way, I think - depends what Obama does, as well as on the actions of creditors such as China, Japan and Russia.
Here is the link to Antal Fekete’s article, its worth a read:
http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/fekete/2009/0330.html
May 29th, 2009 at 11:13 am
Slowsmile: It it is May Haze to be followed by June Gloom here. On America’s left coast Social Security Recipients received $250 Obama-grams this past week and there frankly is little or no attention to national issues or for that matter attentionm at all. Obama remains irrationally popular and there is a growing consensus that Obama indeed some sort of economic messiah while everyone awaits federal checks to save their butts.
May 29th, 2009 at 11:27 am
Richard…I am surprised at what you describe. Can’t understand why Obama is so popular. What has he achieved so far to deserve such undying popularity?…Where are the results of his hope and change?
Or is he still campaigning?
May 29th, 2009 at 11:32 am
Obama can only campaign. Today he released a report titled: 100 Days; 100 Projects. The very first one was supported to be a multi million retrofitting of Washington DC houseing project all except $47,000 was done before he was President. The whole think is a bad joke on people who can not tie their shoes.
Most Americans are concerned about the ethereal and amotional.
May 29th, 2009 at 11:49 am
That doesn’t impress me. Sounds like Obama’s buffing his own shiny badge to me. I worry because he’s got the likes of Summers and Geithner in his camp advising him on bank regulation. This aspect will a big joke too, considering both these gents were deeply involved in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act(1999) which repealed all the Glass Steagall Act(1933) banking regulations. They also pushed for and got unregulated OTC derivatives.
And Geithner and Summers are now in charge of regulating the banks?
I somehow think this will just be a notional event. What a contradiction !!