Dark Skinny

“Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt…” - Mark Twain

Dollar Endgame Approaches….Countdown to 2013

Posted by slowsmile on August 28, 2010

Here is a very underplayed though extremely serious article from the Financial Times, which describes exactly how the Chinese are expanding their bid for installment of their renminbi into, at the least, becoming the major regional reserve currency of the Asia Region.  Even the MacDonald’s food chain in China is about to issue its own renminbi denominated bonds. The big banks — like HSBC –  are dumping the dollar and are positively clamouring to get into the stable and solidly backed renminbi bandwagon.

And so begins the slow slide of the international trade dollar into, at best, a regional currency.

Even Americans banks like Citigroup and JP Morgan have turned Dollar Traitor and are joining this Asian throng and desertng the international dollar in droves now.

I’ve been screaming and warning about this for about two years now. I guess no one’s listening or no one’s that bothered. Well, for those who are still interested, here is some fairly overt evidence of the serious beginnings of the international trade dollar’s inevitable coming demise.

Banks back switch to renminbi for trade

By Robert Cookson in Hong Kong - Financial Times

A number of the world’s biggest banks have launched international roadshows promoting the use of the renminbi to corporate customers instead of the dollar for trade deals with China.

HSBC, which recently moved its chief executive from London to Hong Kong, and Standard Chartered, are offering discounted transaction fees and other financial incentives to companies that choose to settle trade in the Chinese currency.

“We’re now capable of doing renminbi settlement in many parts of the world,” said Chris Lewis, HSBC’s head of trade for greater China. “All the other major international banks are frantically trying to do the same thing.”

HSBC and StanChart are among a slew of global banks – including Citigroup and JPMorgan – holding roadshows across Asia, Europe and the US to promote the renminbi to companies.

The move aligns the banks favourably with Beijing’s policy priorities and positions them to profit from what is expected to be a rapidly growing line of business in the future.

The phenomenon will accelerate Beijing’s drive to transform the renminbi from a domestic currency into a global medium of exchange like the dollar and euro.

Chinese central bank officials accompanied StanChart bankers on a roadshow to Korea and Japan in June. The bank held similar events in London, Frankfurt and Paris.

Lisa Robins, JPMorgan’s head of treasury and securities services for China, said there had been a “spike in interest” from international clients.

An increasing number of Chinese companies have been asking foreign trading partners to accept renminbi as payment, said Carmen Ling, Hong Kong head of global transaction services at Citi.

BBVA, Spain’s second-biggest bank, is also drawing up plans for a global marketing campaign that will focus on Latin American companies that export to China.

Banks started establishing renminbi trade settlement operations in mid-2009, when Beijing introduced a pilot scheme allowing companies to use the renminbi for trade outside China.

The scramble has intensified in recent months as Beijing has substantially expanded the scheme – from a handful of Asian countries to the whole world – and introduced other liberalisations to its currency regime.

Cross-border trade in renminbi totalled Rmb70.6bn ($10bn) in the first half of the year – about 20 times the Rmb3.6bn recorded in the second half of 2009.

But those figures remain tiny compared to the $2,800bn worth of goods and services that were traded across China’s borders last year, most of which was settled in dollars or euros.

With renminbi trade settlement volumes expected to increase rapidly, banks are under pressure to establish a foothold in the nascent market and demonstrate to Chinese officials that they are committed to the scheme.

China has taken several steps in recent months to boost the international use of its currency and to establish Hong Kong, the special administrative region, as the global centre for offshore renminbi business.

McDonald’s, the US burger chain and icon of globalisation, took advantage of the new rules this month when it became the first foreign multinational to issue renminbi-denominated bonds in Hong Kong.

Posted in Big Government, Economics, US Politics, World Politics | 2 Comments »

Kotlikoff: US is Bankrupt and We Don’t Even Know It

Posted by slowsmile on August 19, 2010

Aug. 11 (Bloomberg) — Laurence Kotlikoff, an economics professor at Boston University, talks about the state of the U.S. economy. Kotlikoff speaks with Erik Schatzker on Bloomberg Television’s InsideTrack.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Let’s get real. The U.S. is bankrupt. Neither spending more nor taxing less will help the country pay its bills.

What it can and must do is radically simplify its tax, health-care, retirement and financial systems, each of which is a complete mess. But this is the good news. It means they can each be redesigned to achieve their legitimate purposes at much lower cost and, in the process, revitalize the economy.

Last month, the International Monetary Fund released its annual review of U.S. economic policy. Its summary contained these bland words about U.S. fiscal policy: “Directors welcomed the authorities’ commitment to fiscal stabilization, but noted that a larger than budgeted adjustment would be required to stabilize debt-to-GDP.”

But delve deeper, and you will find that the IMF has effectively pronounced the U.S. bankrupt. Section 6 of the July 2010 Selected Issues Paper says: “The U.S. fiscal gap associated with today’s federal fiscal policy is huge for plausible discount rates.” It adds that “closing the fiscal gap requires a permanent annual fiscal adjustment equal to about 14 percent of U.S. GDP.”

The fiscal gap is the value today (the present value) of the difference between projected spending (including servicing official debt) and projected revenue in all future years.

Double Our Taxes

To put 14 percent of gross domestic product in perspective, current federal revenue totals 14.9 percent of GDP. So the IMF is saying that closing the U.S. fiscal gap, from the revenue side, requires, roughly speaking, an immediate and permanent doubling of our personal-income, corporate and federal taxes as well as the payroll levy set down in the Federal Insurance Contribution Act.

Such a tax hike would leave the U.S. running a surplus equal to 5 percent of GDP this year, rather than a 9 percent deficit. So the IMF is really saying the U.S. needs to run a huge surplus now and for many years to come to pay for the spending that is scheduled. It’s also saying the longer the country waits to make tough fiscal adjustments, the more painful they will be.

Is the IMF bonkers?

No. It has done its homework. So has the Congressional Budget Office whose Long-Term Budget Outlook, released in June, shows an even larger problem.

‘Unofficial’ Liabilities

Based on the CBO’s data, I calculate a fiscal gap of $202 trillion, which is more than 15 times the official debt. This gargantuan discrepancy between our “official” debt and our actual net indebtedness isn’t surprising. It reflects what economists call the labeling problem. Congress has been very careful over the years to label most of its liabilities “unofficial” to keep them off the books and far in the future.

For example, our Social Security FICA contributions are called taxes and our future Social Security benefits are called transfer payments. The government could equally well have labeled our contributions “loans” and called our future benefits “repayment of these loans less an old age tax,” with the old age tax making up for any difference between the benefits promised and principal plus interest on the contributions.

The fiscal gap isn’t affected by fiscal labeling. It’s the only theoretically correct measure of our long-run fiscal condition because it considers all spending, no matter how labeled, and incorporates long-term and short-term policy.

$4 Trillion Bill

How can the fiscal gap be so enormous?

Simple. We have 78 million baby boomers who, when fully retired, will collect benefits from Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid that, on average, exceed per-capita GDP. The annual costs of these entitlements will total about $4 trillion in today’s dollars. Yes, our economy will be bigger in 20 years, but not big enough to handle this size load year after year.

This is what happens when you run a massive Ponzi scheme for six decades straight, taking ever larger resources from the young and giving them to the old while promising the young their eventual turn at passing the generational buck.

Herb Stein, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under U.S. President Richard Nixon, coined an oft-repeated phrase: “Something that can’t go on, will stop.” True enough. Uncle Sam’s Ponzi scheme will stop. But it will stop too late.

And it will stop in a very nasty manner. The first possibility is massive benefit cuts visited on the baby boomers in retirement. The second is astronomical tax increases that leave the young with little incentive to work and save. And the third is the government simply printing vast quantities of money to cover its bills.

Worse Than Greece

Most likely we will see a combination of all three responses with dramatic increases in poverty, tax, interest rates and consumer prices. This is an awful, downhill road to follow, but it’s the one we are on. And bond traders will kick us miles down our road once they wake up and realize the U.S. is in worse fiscal shape than Greece.

Some doctrinaire Keynesian economists would say any stimulus over the next few years won’t affect our ability to deal with deficits in the long run.

This is wrong as a simple matter of arithmetic. The fiscal gap is the government’s credit-card bill and each year’s 14 percent of GDP is the interest on that bill. If it doesn’t pay this year’s interest, it will be added to the balance.

Demand-siders say forgoing this year’s 14 percent fiscal tightening, and spending even more, will pay for itself, in present value, by expanding the economy and tax revenue.

My reaction? Get real, or go hang out with equally deluded supply-siders. Our country is broke and can no longer afford no-pain, all-gain “solutions”.

Posted in Economics, US Politics, World Politics | 3 Comments »

Without a Revolution, Americans are History

Posted by slowsmile on August 17, 2010

kjj

It has become more than apparent to me that in no way can America’s government — or her deceitful and corrupt representatives on both sides of the isle — save America now. The US deficit/debt has reached such ridiculously elevated levels of excess that soon, America will be unable to even pay the interest due. But the lies just keep coming don’t they? The Chinese, Russians, Japan, Brazil, the Middle East — all massive holders of US debt Treasuries in the past — have now become sick  and tired of this Old Empire shell-game and are fast losing any last shreds of faith in the dollar. And still the beloved MSM continues to spew forth its headlines about a recovery and people stubbornly continue to believe in the fairness and honesty of their government and democratic process — that everything is just dinky…


Without a Revolution, Americans Are History

By Paul Craig Roberts
Prison Planet.com
Monday, August 16, 2010

The United States is running out of time to get its budget and trade deficits under control.  Despite the urgency of the situation, 2010 has been wasted in hype about a non-existent recovery.  As recently as August 2 Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner penned a New York Times column, “Welcome to the Recovery.”

As John Williams (shadowstats.com) has made clear on many occasions, an appearance of recovery was created by over-counting employment and undercounting inflation. Warnings by Williams, Gerald Celente, and myself have gone unheeded, but our warnings recently had echoes from Boston University professor Laurence Kotlikoff and from David Stockman, who excoriated the Republican Party for becoming big-spending Democrats.

It is encouraging to see some realization that, this time, Washington cannot spend the economy out of recession. The deficits are already too large for the dollar to survive as reserve currency, and deficit spending cannot put Americans back to work in jobs that have been moved offshore.

However, the solutions offered by those who are beginning to recognize that there is a problem are discouraging. Kotlikoff thinks the solution is savage Social Security and Medicare cuts or equally savage tax increases or hyperinflation to destroy the vast debts.

Perhaps economists lack imagination, or perhaps they don’t want to be cut off from Wall Street and corporate subsidies, but Social Security and Medicare are insufficient at their present levels, especially considering the erosion of private pensions by the dot com, derivative and real estate bubbles. Cuts in Social Security and Medicare, for which people have paid 15 per cent of their earnings all their lives, would result in starvation and deaths from curable diseases.

Tax increases make even less sense. It is widely acknowledged that the majority of households cannot survive on one job. Both husband and wife work and often one of the partners has two jobs in order to make ends meet. Raising taxes makes it harder to make ends meet–thus more foreclosures, more food stamps, more homelessness. What kind of economist or humane person thinks this is a solution?

Ah, but we will tax the rich. The rich have enough money. They will simply stop earning.

Let’s get real.  Here is what the government is likely to do.  Once  Washington realize that the dollar is at risk and that they can no longer finance their wars by borrowing abroad, the government will either levy a tax on private pensions on the grounds that the pensions have accumulated tax-deferred, or the government will require pension fund managers to purchase Treasury debt with our pensions. This will buy the government a bit more time while pension accounts are loaded up with worthless paper.

The last Bush budget deficit (2008) was in the $400-500 billion range, about the size of the Chinese, Japanese, and OPEC trade surpluses with the US. Traditionally, these trade surpluses have been recycled to the US and finance the federal budget deficit. In 2009 and 2010 the federal deficit jumped to $1,400 billion, a back-to-back trillion dollar increase. There are not sufficient trade surpluses to finance a deficit this large. From where comes the money?

The answer is from individuals fleeing the stock market into “safe” Treasury bonds and from the bankster bailout, not so much the TARP money as the Federal Reserve’s exchange of bank reserves for questionable financial paper such as subprime derivatives. The banks used their excess reserves to purchase Treasury debt.

These financing maneuvers are one-time tricks. Once people have fled stocks, that movement into Treasuries is over. The opposition to the bankster bailout likely precludes another. So where does the money come from the next time?

The Treasury was able to unload a lot of debt thanks to “the Greek crisis,” which the New York banksters and hedge funds multiplied into “the euro crisis.” The financial press served as a financing arm for the US Treasury by creating panic about European debt and the euro. Central banks and individuals who had taken refuge from the dollar in euros were panicked out of their euros, and they rushed into dollars by purchasing US Treasury debt.

This movement from euros to dollars weakened the alternative reserve currency to the dollar, halted the dollar’s decline, and financed the US budget deficit a while longer.

Possibly the game can be replayed with Spanish debt, Irish debt, and whatever unlucky country is eswept in by the thoughtless expansion of the European Union.

But when no countries remain that can be destabilized by Wall Street investment banksters and hedge funds, what then finances the US budget deficit?

The only remaining financier is the Federal Reserve. When Treasury bonds brought to auction do not sell, the Federal Reserve must purchase them. The Federal Reserve purchases the bonds by creating new demand deposits, or checking accounts, for the Treasury. As the Treasury spends the proceeds of the new debt sales, the US money supply expands by the amount of the Federal Reserve’s purchase of Treasury debt.

Do goods and services expand by the same amount?  Imports will increase as US jobs have been offshored and given to foreigners, thus worsening the trade deficit.  When the Federal Reserve purchases the Treasury’s new debt issues, the money supply will increase by more than the supply of domestically produced goods and services. Prices are likely to rise.

How high will they rise? The longer money is created in order that government can pay its bills, the more likely hyperinflation will be the result.

The economy has not recovered. By the end of this year it will be obvious that the collapsing economy means a larger than $1.4 trillion budget deficit to finance. Will it be $2 trillion? Higher?

Whatever the size, the rest of the world will see that the dollar is being printed in such quantities that it cannot serve as reserve currency. At that point wholesale dumping of dollars will result as foreign central banks try to unload a worthless currency.

The collapse of the dollar will drive up the prices of imports and offshored goods on which Americans are dependent. Wal-Mart shoppers will think they have mistakenly gone into Neiman Marcus.

Domestic prices will also explode as a growing money supply chases the supply of goods and services still made in America by Americans.

The dollar as reserve currency cannot survive the conflagration. When the dollar goes the US cannot finance its trade deficit. Therefore, imports will fall sharply, thus adding to domestic inflation and, as the US is energy import-dependent, there will be transportation disruptions that will disrupt work and grocery store deliveries.

Panic will be the order of the day.

Will farms will be raided? Will those trapped in cities resort to riots and looting?

Is this the likely future that “our” government and “our patriotic” corporations have created for us?

To borrow from Lenin, “What can be done?”

Here is what can be done. The wars, which benefit no one but the military-security complex and Israel’s territorial expansion, can be immediately ended. This would reduce the US budget deficit by hundreds of billions of dollars per year.  More hundreds of billions of dollars could be saved by cutting the rest of the military budget which, in its present size, exceeds the budgets of all the serious military powers on earth combined.

US military spending reflects the unaffordable and unattainable crazed neoconservative  goal of US Empire and world hegemony. What fool in Washington thinks that China is going to finance US hegemony over China?

The only way that the US will again have an economy is by bringing back the offshored jobs. The loss of these jobs impoverished Americans while producing oversized gains for Wall Street, shareholders, and corporate executives. These jobs can be brought home where they belong by taxing corporations according to where value is added to their product. If value is added to their goods and services in China, corporations would have a high tax rate. If value is added to their goods and services in the US, corporations would have a low tax rate.

This change in corporate taxation would offset the cheap foreign labor that has sucked jobs out of America, and it would rebuild the ladders of upward mobility that made America an opportunity society.

If the wars are not immediately stopped and the jobs brought back to America, the US is relegated to the trash bin of history.

Obviously, the corporations and Wall Street would use their financial power and campaign contributions to block any legislation that would reduce short-term earnings and bonuses by bringing jobs back to America. Americans have no greater enemies than Wall Street and the corporations and their prostitutes in Congress and the White House.

The neocons allied with Israel, who control both parties and much of the media, are strung out on the ecstasy of Empire.

The United States and the welfare of its 300 million people cannot be restored unless the neocons, Wall Street, the corporations, and their servile slaves in Congress and the White House can be defeated.

Without a revolution, Americans are history.

Posted in Big Government, Economics, US Politics, World Politics | No Comments »

Harsh Realities when East meets West

Posted by slowsmile on August 2, 2010

I’ve mentioned many times that both the economic wealth and power of the West will slowly transfer to the East and the article below, with reference to mainly UK as well as Europe, refers directly to this oncoming event. The article highlights that Cameron, the UK Prime Minister, in his recent visit to India, is openly  acknowledging the important position and role that India plays in the world. Here, there has been a reshuffling of attitudes in economics and the pawns of  power, an acknowledgement that if the UK is to maintain some sort of position both in Europe and the rest of the World and survive economically in the future, then economic allies must be made in the East. Notably, this approach has not been utilized by the US government, whose dollar, stock markets, internal economy and relationships with other foreign and eastern countries — most notably China — have become merely a sad roller-coaster ride and retreat into accusations, continual empty and tired excuses for deficit/debt policies and deliberate and distracting political double-speak. And the best descriptions of these US policies that come to my mind are dismal and suicidal . It seems that President Obama prefers making enemies rather than collecting economic friends. I guess that you could say that the American government still prefers to go it alone but I would further add that I seriously believe that UK and Europe are perhaps quicker on the draw here in reacting more intelligently to the above global economic situation. And not only are Europe and UK acting to actually reduce their deficits and debt, they are also trying to make economic friends in the East as well which seems sensible to me. Obama’s policies seem to represent the exact opposite approach in economic policy.

Cameron swallows the bitter pill as the East casts shadow over Europe

Three seemingly unrelated speeches struck a chord with me last week. None of them, to my mind, was anything more than a statement of the obvious. Taken together, though, they provided a stark illustration of the rapid pace at which the global balanceof power is shifting and the extent to which the Western world’s sub-prime fiasco is accelerating and accentuating that trend.

By Liam Halligan from the UK Telegraph

It wasn’t David Cameron’s visit to India that was interesting, more the accompanying spin. The Prime Minister, keen to burnish his “world statesman” credentials, was always going to rack up the air miles during his early months in office. But Cameron’s utterances on this trip, stage-managed and contrived as they were, still managed to convey something important. That something was a new willingness on the part of the British political elite, long overdue, to recognise that the shape of the world economy is rapidly changing – and to the UK’s detriment.

The Prime Minister led a travelling circus of a delegation to the sub-Continent – six ministers and 30 senior business executives. Aside from the political theatre, he wanted to show the UK is now serious about capitalizing on its deep cultural and historical ties to India, boosting commercial links with the second most populous country on earth.

Cameron’s message was different, though, part of the Tories’ new commitment to a “distinctive foreign policy” that moves beyond the imperialist “great games” of previous centuries, focused instead on drumming-up business in large emerging economies such as China, Brazil and India. The Cameron doctrine remains vague, practically embryonic. But it contains the germ of a profound, yet uncomfortable truth.

For the truth is that the countries the Western world once ruled, the peoples we used to subjugate and deride, are in the process of supplanting the “mature economies” at the top table of commercial – and ultimately political – power. That’s a tough one to swallow, but swallow it we must.

The reason is that Indian commerce is these days about so much more than “cheap labour” call-centres and Bollywood movies. India is transforming itself into a manufacturing and hi-tech superpower, fast scaling the value chain, doing what the West does but doing it cheaper. Far from being dependent on us, India’s economic prowess means it has become the source of billions of pounds of inward investment into the UK. Rather than “stealing” British jobs, Indian businesses are now more likely to provide them.

In 1770 - just before the last Industrial Revolution – India was among the world’s biggest economies, accounting for a sixth of global output. By 2040 or so, with its ever-expanding and increasingly skilled work force, it will once again be among the very largest economies, vying with China for top spot.

Cameron has grasped the inevitability of this long-term mega-trend. He understands that we in the West need to engage with and trade with the emerging giants far more than we do, if we’re to avoid an even sharper decline in our future standard of living.

More than 50pc of the UK’s trade is with the EU. Yet Western Europe, for all its current wealth, is a low-growth region where populations are declining and consumers, firms and governments are mired in debt. China and India, in contrast, are where credit can expand, where the growth is - the mass markets of tomorrow. Yet China accounts for only 2pc of British exports and India for less than 1pc. For a supposedly outward-looking, trading nation like the UK, that’s absurd.

During the next few decades, UK incomes are bound to fall relative to much of the rest of the world. The question is, can we avoid a far more painful decline in our absolute levels of income. The only hope we have of doing so is by broadening our horizons, reducing our trade reliance on old Europe and the US and embracing the rest of the world.

The more deferential “partnership of equals” attitude Cameron now presents towards India - and which, in turn, he will adopt in other large emerging markets in the months to come – will grate with many Tory traditionalists, nostalgic as they are for the days when Britain called the shots. But there really is no alternative.

Alongside Cameron’s Indian summer, my second eye-catcher from last week was a speech given by a little known, but influential Asian executive, called Tony Tan. As a leading player at GIC, a Singaporean sovereign wealth fund with more than $100bn under management, Tan is an astute observer - paid to invest his country’s massive reserves.

Tan’s subject was not so much the on-going eastward shift in the global centre of gravity - obvious to most Asian professionals - but that the “sub-prime” meltdown will make that shift happen faster still. “Developed economies will take a long time to recover from the global crisis,” Tan argued, “but the emerging nations will gain in importance, with the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009 accelerating the shift in economic power from the developed world to the emerging world”.

He’s right, of course. Sub-prime, and the related bank bail-outs and money-printing will weigh down the West’s performance for years to come. The big emerging economies, in contrast, have massive reserves, low debts and no need to “de-lever”.

That’s why highly-respected players like Tan increasingly view the “advanced” nations – with their vast deficits and lack of reserves – as weaker, and more prone to systemic risk than their Eastern counterparts. “For investors, the strength of the emerging markets means that a larger proportion of their investments will be in these markets,” argues Tan – who, remember, holds sways over tens of billions of dollars of capital. “Far from being a risky and perhaps optional part of their portfolios, emerging markets will become a core and unavoidable asset class in global portfolios”, he said.

The third speech I noticed was by Guan Jianzhong, the feisty boss of Dagong Global, the largest ratings agency in China. Condemning his Western rivals as “politicised and highly ideological”, he called for China to have more say in the worldwide ratings ascribed to various countries’ sovereign debts. “The US is insolvent and faces bankruptcy,” boomed Guan. “The ratings agencies didn’t properly disclose risk and this brought the entire US financial system to the verge of collapse”.

The privately-owned Dagong has just published its own list of sovereign credit ratings – which Guan claims is a first for a non-Western agency.

China ranks higher – i.e. is more credit-worthy - than the US, the UK and France. Again, this is a statement of the obvious. China has the world’s biggest foreign exchange reserves while the Western world has almost none. But the truths that Guan screams are even more uncomfortable for the West than the realities uttered by Tan.

When it comes to facing up to the implications of sub-prime, the Western world’s grotesque indebtedness and the broad arc of history, David Cameron made a start last week. But he has an awful long way to go

.

Posted in Big Government, EDUCATION, U.K. Politics, US Politics, World Politics | No Comments »

Chinese rating agency strips Western Nations of AAA status

Posted by slowsmile on July 13, 2010

img

Well I’m busting a gut here…This is so funny!! Who would have thought the Chinese would be this clever in delivering their message to the West — allowing one of their own private rating agencies to really rip into and trash the fatuous economic debt policies of America, Britain, France and Germany…LOL…

Yes, Hu would have thought it indeed !!

At least now the West knows exactly what Asia is really thinking….and it sure as hell ain’t, “Thank you ma’am, I’ll have more of the same…”

Bwahahahahaha !!!…’Scuse me…gotta grab me some air, I’m dying here…!!

Chinese rating agency strips Western nations of AAA status

China’s leading credit rating agency has stripped America, Britain, Germany and France of their AAA ratings, accusing Anglo-Saxon competitors of ideological bias in favour of the West.

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, International Business Editor, UK Telegraph
Published: 9:17PM BST 12 Jul 2010

Dagong Global Credit Rating Co used its first foray into sovereign debt to paint a revolutionary picture of creditworthiness around the world, giving much greater weight to “wealth creating capacity” and foreign reserves than Fitch, Standard & Poor’s, or Moody’s.

The US falls to AA, while Britain and France slither down to AA-. Belgium, Spain, Italy are ranked at A- along with Malaysia.

Meanwhile, China rises to AA+ with Germany, the Netherlands and Canada, reflecting its €2.4 trillion (£2 trillion) reserves and a blistering growth rate of 8pc to 10pc a year.

Dominique Strauss-Kahn, chief of the International Monetary Fund, agreed on Monday that the rising East is a transforming global force. “Asia’s time has come,” he said.

The IMF expects Asia to grow by 7.7pc in 2010, vastly outpacing the eurozone at 1pc and the US at 3.3pc. Emerging nations hold 75pc of the world’s $8.4 trillion (£5.6 trillion) of reserves.

Dagong rates Norway, Denmark, Switzerland, and Singapore at AAA, along with the commodity twins Australia and New Zealand.

Chinese president Hu Jintao said in April that the world needs “an objective, fair, and reasonable standard” for rating sovereign debt. Dagong appears to have stepped into the role, saying its objective was to assess countries using methods that would “not be affected by ideology”.

“The reason for the global financial crisis and debt crisis in Europe is that the current international credit rating system does not correctly reveal the debtor’s repayment ability,” said Guan Jianzhong, Dagong’s chairman.

The agency, known in China for rating companies, said its goal is to “correct the defects” of the existing system and offer a counter-weight to Western agencies.

Dagong appears to base growth potential on past performance but this can be misleading, especially in states enjoying technology catch-up. Japan was a high-flyer in 1970s and 1980s before stalling when the Nikkei bubble burst. It has been trapped in near perma-slump ever since.

China may start to face some of Japan’s demographic problems by the middle of this decade when the working age population peaks.

The Western rating agencies put a high value on a long-established rule of law and government institutions that have proved resilient over many decades, or even centuries. China’s political system may appear strong – as did the Soviet Union’s – but only time will tell whether its foundations are brittle. The violent upheavals of the Cultural Revolution are still a very fresh memory.



Posted in Big Government, Economics, Georgia, Humour, Medical, Russian Oil, US Politics, World Oil, World Politics | No Comments »